
Back to alternative history
Contents
1. Preface
2. Spinoza's World, 1664
3. The Sabbateans
4. The Disputation
5. The Holy Land
6. Marriage
7. Common Prayer
8. America
9. Gottfried and Sophia
10. The Sublime Porte
11. Spinoza's World, 1691
12. Mustafa and the Janissaries
13. Naomi
14. Regime Change
15. Tulips
16. Twilight
17. Spinoza's World, 1712
18. Epilogue
Appendix
|
Spinoza in
Turkey |
---|
"Surely thy Lord knows very well who has gone astray
from His way, and He knows very well those who are rightly guided."
-- Sura 68:7 | |
Part 10 - The Sublime Porte November 1687 to October 1690 |
The revolt of 1687 tore through Constantinople with brutal force.
Those unable to flee the city or barricade themselves in their
homes were massacred by the vengeful Janissaries; neither
Christian, Muslim nor Jew was spared. No accurate account has
ever been made of the number of people killed during the
overthrow of Mehmet IV, but it is likely that they numbered in
the thousands.
The Janissaries' fury spent itself quickly, though, and it was
not directed at any single group of people. Although some
Rational Jews, the court physician among them, lost their lives
and the Rational Synagogue was damaged in the rioting, the
Janissaries made no attempt to root out or exterminate the
Rationalists. Their rage was focused on one person and one
person only - the sultan who had presided over two of the
greatest defeats in the history of the Ottoman realm.
Thus it was that, as they unbarred their doors and returned from
their places of refuge, the Rational Jews found things much the
same as before. The new Sultan, Suleiman II [FN1], was a
nonentity who had spent the past thirty-odd years confined in a
harem, and the first months of his reign had little direction
beyond gaining control of the capital and regrouping the army.
The Sultan had the presence of mind to crack down on the unpaid
troops who were looting the city and regularize the collection of
taxes, but his years of dissipation had left him with neither the
knowledge nor the will to attempt major reforms. Although some
Janissaries grumbled against the Rationalists, their millet
status was left undisturbed, and they were granted permission to
rebuild their synagogues and meeting halls.
All the same, the Rational leaders realized that they had
powerful enemies at the new Sultan's court, and moved quickly to
establish themselves in his favor. Rabbi Jacob ben Israel
Benvenisti had died two years since, but Haham Saltiel had ably
taken over his role as the Rational movement's chief political
spokesman. Although Spinoza was technically the governor of the
Rational millet, Saltiel had been its effective administrator for
years, and he was wise in the ways of the court. Within a month
after Suleiman II's accession, Saltiel took up a collection
among the leading Rational families and presented it as a gift to
the Ottoman army. Through his friends at court - both those long
established and those newly won with judicious bribes - he made
clear that additional concrete expressions of gratitude would be
forthcoming if the Rational Jews were permitted to live as
before. Had anyone compared Saltiel to the court Jews of
Germany, he would doubtless have been insulted, but his method of
buying favor was the same as theirs, and worked at least as well
- it won time for his community while the great men of the
Ottoman Empire debated the future.
The defeat at Mohacs brought an unprecedented degree of self-
examination within the hitherto complacent Turkish court. The
empire, which had previously known only momentary setbacks, had
suffered two of the greatest defeats of its long history. The
battles of Vienna and Mohacs had already cost the Sultan his
throne and the Grand Vizier his head, but many wondered if
something more than that was necessary - wondered, in fact,
whether there was something rotten at the empire's core.
As 1688 progressed, the court resolved itself into two parties.
On the one hand, there were the reactionaries, many of them
Janissaries or radical preachers, who believed that dar al-Islam
had been corrupted by sin and that it was necessary to return to
the fundamentals of the faith. On the other were the liberals,
who believed that the empire's salvation lay in emulating the
spirit of inquiry and learning that was sweeping the west. Among
them were the members of the Rational Society - which, scarcely
six years after its founding, suddenly found itself with an ear
at court.
|
|
In the summer of 1688, the Rational Society numbered at most in
the hundreds, but its membership was disproportionately drawn
from the wealthy and educated. And throughout that year, it grew
in size as its leaders and scholars were called to consult with
the great men of the court. To be sure, its enemies also became
more numerous and more powerful, and there were attacks and even
assassinations, but the balance of power was nearly equal and
these enemies were unable to strike a decisive blow.
Both the Society's detractors and its members were already
beginning to call it the Neo-Mu'tazilite School, but this was
something of a misnomer. The Rational Society accepted the
central Mu'tazilite premise that God was knowable through reason
and that His essence could be divined outside the context of
revelation, and it also accepted the Mu'tazilite cosmology and
the theory of atoms. On the other hand, it was far more forgiving
toward those in a state of sin, whom it regarded as part of the
Muslim faith despite their flaws, and it did not - yet -
challenge the authority of the sharia.
Nor, although the members of the Rational Society counted
Spinoza's works among their inspirations, did they follow
Spinoza's teachings blindly. They had learned the philosopher's
lesson well, and believed that nothing was immune from
challenge, including the works of their teacher. The Society's
founder, Ismet Celer, had already fired several broadsides at
Spinoza on the matter of predestination, and his defense of free
will against the Jewish philosopher's arguments had been widely
circulated in the Ottoman realm and Europe. [FN2] For all that,
however, Celer and Spinoza respected each other, and their
disagreements were the jousting of colleagues rather than the
clashes of enemies.
And both their stars would ascend together, for on October 25,
1689, Fazil Mustafa Pasha, a reformer and a member of the
Kprl family, was appointed Grand Vizier. The interregnum had
ended, and for the time being, the liberals had won. So it was
that when the new Vizier set about the task of reforming the army
and the state, two of the men he consulted were Ismet Celer and
Baruch Spinoza.
Fazil Pasha's program was far-reaching. He purged the officer
corps, reformed military training and shifted responsibility for
supplies from private contractors to a government department. He
made an aggressive effort, if not an entirely successful one, to
root out corruption in the civil service. He increased the
autonomy of the Christian and Jewish millets, whose international
connections were useful for the empire's trade. And, most
critically for Spinoza and the Rational Society, he determined
that the imperial court should promote learning and the useful
arts. [FN3]
It was during one of their consultations that Spinoza mentioned
an admirable innovation that was practiced in the American
provinces of Massachusetts and Pennsylvania - common schools,
where all boys could learn their letters. He pointed out, as
well, that this would not be the first time that public schools
had existed within what was now the Ottoman realm; after all,
Rabbi Simeon ben Shetach had decreed more than seventeen hundred
years before that all male children be taught to read, and had
established primary schools for that purpose. Finally, he urged
that Constantinople have a university like the great schools of
Europe, where the sciences and the useful arts could flourish.
[FN4]
The Grand Vizier's response was to appoint Spinoza and Celer as
joint ministers of education, and charge them with the task of
establishing a university and a system of common schools in the
capital. Although Spinoza had always shunned political office,
he readily accepted this task as a labor of love. The first
schools - simple, one-room affairs in formerly abandoned houses
- opened by the spring of 1690, and, with Saltiel watching over
his shoulder, Spinoza was careful to provide patronage to all the
influential parties rather than hiring teachers exclusively from
the Rational communities. [FN5] The university was somewhat
harder - natural philosophers were in relatively short supply in
the Ottoman realm, and many European scholars had no wish to
serve the Sultan - but some needed to put distance between
themselves and angry lords, and others could be had for a price.
Celer, for his part, taught some of the medical classes himself
and sent men throughout the empire to recruit scholars of
medicine, theology and law. Slowly, the university took shape;
it was small at first, hardly worthy of being mentioned in the
same breath as Oxford or Heidelberg, but it would grow.
On October 25, 1690, the Ottoman army retook Belgrade. Far more
important to Spinoza, however, was the fact that the university
of Constantinople opened for classes on the same day.
|
|
[FN1] Some accounts give his title as Suleiman III, and refer to
Suleiman the Magnificent as Suleiman II.
[FN2] In this, the Rational Society is following the Mu'tazilite
philosophy rather than Spinoza's.
[FN3] IMO this program is in character for Fazil Pasha, who was
an aggressive reformer in OTL. He actually did, or attempted to
do, all the things listed above with the exception of promoting
education, and IMO he could be convinced to do that in an
environment where Constantinople is a center of philosophy.
He'll have to avoid going too far, though, and the taxes
necessary to fund schools in the capital won't sit well with the
peasants in the hinterlands, both of which are likely to cause
trouble ahead.
[FN4] In OTL, there were no universities in the Ottoman Empire
until 1900.
[FN5] Actually, it's likely that Saltiel took care of hiring the
teachers and never told Spinoza where he was getting them.
|
|
|